Dear Rusty: My wife and I were both born in 1953. My wife will reach her full retirement age in March 2019 and I will reach mine in June of 2019. My wife's benefit will be roughly $2,200/month and mine will be about $2,700/month if we were to file for payments. An option I have considered is spousal benefits only. In June of 2019 can my wife or I file and suspend our benefits and the other file for spousal benefits and receive half of the others benefits while both our benefits continue to earn credit (8% per year) until we both hit 70? Signed: Looking to Maximize
Dear Looking: Well, you can’t do things quite the way you suggest, but you do have a different option known as the “restricted application for spousal benefits only” which either of you can exercise because you were both born before the cutoff date in the 2015 law which changed the File and Suspend option.
You can’t both “file and suspend” benefits as you asked but using the Restricted Application (RA) allows one of you to file for benefits and the other to file the RA to collect half of the other spouse’s benefit while allowing their own benefit to grow. To use the restricted application, I usually suggest that the lower-earning spouse apply for their retirement benefits first, allowing the higher-earning spouse to file the RA and collect ½ of the lower-earning spouse’s benefit while their own retirement benefit grows at a rate of 8% per year of delay (actually 2/3rds of 1% per month of delay). You can delay up until age 70 when you’ll get 32% more than you will get at age 66.
So if your wife applies in March 2019 and collects her full benefit, you could file the RA when you reach age 66 in June 2019 and get half of your wife’s benefit (about $1,100/month) for 4 years until you reach 70, at which point you can switch to your own retirement benefit which would be about $3564 per month (using the numbers you provided). Since your wife’s retirement benefit would always be more than her spousal benefit (half of your FRA benefit), she would continue receiving her own full retirement benefit, unless you should predecease her, in which case she would get 100% of the increased benefit you are receiving instead of her normal retirement benefit.
But there is another alternative: You could both simply wait until you are 70 to apply and both get the 32% benefit increase, which for your wife would mean about $700 more per month. Which is the better alternative? Only you can decide, while comparing expected longevity against your wife collecting an additional $700 per month starting at age 70. In a little over 6 years, your wife’s additional monthly benefit would offset what you would have received in spousal benefits from the Restricted Application, and she’d get the higher benefit for the rest of her life. In the end, it always comes down to how badly you need the money now, your health and your expected longevity.
This article is intended for information purposes only and does not represent legal or financial guidance. It presents the opinions and interpretations of the AMAC Foundation’s staff, trained and accredited by the National Social Security Association (NSSA). NSSA and the AMAC Foundation and its staff are not affiliated with or endorsed by the Social Security Administration or any other governmental entity. To submit a question, visit our website (amacfoundation.org/programs/social-security-advisory) or email us at ssadvisor@amacfoundation.org.


The Association of Mature American Citizens [AMAC] [https://www.amac.us] is a vibrant, vital senior advocacy organization that takes its marching orders from its members. We act and speak on their behalf, protecting their interests and offering a practical insight on how to best solve the problems they face today. Live long and make a difference by joining us today at https://amac.us/join-amac.